Criteria for evaluation of internet information

Also, opinions or advice should be clearly set apart from information that is "evidence based" that is, based on research results. Are a balance of perspectives represented? Is the information current? Access is provided to MathSciNet, a web-accessible subscription database of the data in Mathematical Reviews MR and Current Mathematical Publications CMPwhich index and review the mathematics research literature from to the present.

Is it full of fact or opinion? Food and Drug Administration and Federal Trade Commission are federal government agencies that help protect consumers from false or misleading health claims on the Internet see Question Carefully evaluate any e-mail messages you receive that provide health-related information.

Print and Internet sources vary widely in their authority, accuracy, objectivity, currency, and coverage. Are references cited fully?

Accuracy — The What In research work, the credibility of most writings is proven through footnotes or other means of revealing the sources of information.

Criteria for evaluation of Internet Information Resources

Is advertising included at the site, and if so, has it had an impact on the content? Here are some points to consider. Colbert Report from Comedy Central A few websites are addressing the issue of misleading information.

Does the page focus on information, news, advocacy, sales, or a mixture? Five criteria for evaluating Web pages - A basic set of criteria accuracy, authority, objectivity, currency, coverage based on: The same basic questions should be asked of all information sources: Holmes recognizes that there is a wealth of information on the Internet.

Are the sources truth worthy? Do the graphics and art serve a function or are they decorative? Are opinions voiced as if they are facts? When was the Web item mounted? Can the researchers, scholars, groups, organizations, institutions, corporations or governmental bodies listed as authors, sponsors or supporters, be verified as such, and what are their qualifications?

Saying what you believe without documentation is not much better than expressing an opinion. Has the information been reviewed by others to insure accuracy? Considers "the following factors: Also includes a bibliography of print and online resources on the topic.

Is the information presented in a way that is easy to use i. And once changed, the original is gone forever unless a specific effort is made to preserve it. Here are additional points to consider regarding Web sites for subject disciplines.

Professional associations have played a historical role in the indexing of hard-to-find materials within their scope.

Web pages are easy to create with little or no training. How does the Web site document the evidence supporting its information? Noting the differences in the publishing paradigm for scholarly resources in print versus that for information appearing on the Internet, Hawkins reports on a study he made of criteria cited by 14 web authors.

Feedback and suggestions of other sites for inclusion are welcomed by the site maintainer, Alastair Smith. Are original sources clear and documented? How comprehensive is this site?

Can the results be refuted or verified through other means--e. University of British Columbia. Do the icons clearly represent what is intended? Is the site inward-focused, pointing outward, or both? What is the purpose of the site? Does it contain a bibliography of print resources, does it cite journal articles and other relevant sources?

Today, however, many online resources are being added to supplement collections, replace printed paper items, or improve access.

Criteria for Evaluating Internet Sources of Information

Another way to learn more about a website is to see "who links to them" and "who they link to. Is multimedia appropriately incorporated?Criteria for evaluation of Internet Information Resources Alastair Smith, VUW Department of Library and Information Studies, New Zealand.

This is a "toolbox" of criteria that enable Internet information sources to be evaluated for use in libraries, e.g. for inclusion in resource guides, and helping users evaluate information found.

Originally written for a presentation,and revised several times since then, this paper addresses the relevancy of criteria for other formats for information on the net, generic evaluation criteria, current evaluation tools on the net, the author's personal indicators of "quality," and suggestions for Internet information providers or.

Criteria for Evaluating Internet Sources of Information Please see my comments regarding the evaluation of print sources of information.

Find the gems amongst all the junk! Learn About: Criteria used to evaluate print and Internet information resources, differences between print and Internet resources, characteristics of scholarly vs. popular periodicals, and the scholarly publication cycle. Evaluating information sources is a important part of the research process.

Not all information is reliable or true, nor will all information be suitable for your paper or. Jun 24,  · You should carefully consider the source of information you find on the Internet and discuss that information with your health care provider.

This fact sheet can help you decide whether the health information you find on the Internet or receive by e-mail is likely to be reliable. who provides the moderation and what criteria the. Accuracy or verifiability of details is an important part of the evaluation process, especially when you are reading the work of an unfamiliar author presented by an unfamiliar organization, or presented in a non-traditional way.

Establishing and learning criteria to filter information you find on the Internet is a good beginning for.

Criteria for evaluation of internet information
Rated 3/5 based on 50 review